The European Long-Term Investment Fund had a breakout year. Scope Fund Analysis published its fifth annual ELTIF study this week, and the headline numbers are hard to ignore: 113 new products launched in 2025, nearly double the 61 launched in 2024. Total AuM reached €34bn, up 55% year-on-year. 56 asset managers launched an ELTIF for the first time.
These are not incremental gains. The ELTIF regime is now the primary wrapper through which European retail and semi-professional investors access private markets — and the velocity of adoption is accelerating.
What Changed: ELTIF 2.0 in Force
The catalyst was regulatory. The ELTIF 2.0 technical standards came into force in October 2024, removing the €10,000 minimum investment threshold, dropping the standalone suitability test, and — critically — allowing semi-liquid (evergreen) structures for the first time. Before ELTIF 2.0, these were closed-end vehicles with fixed maturities. Now they can be structured to allow periodic redemptions, which makes them viable for bank distribution and platform integration.
The result: 45 of the 72 new ELTIFs launched in 2025 for which Scope has maturity data were structured as semi-liquid. Nearly 80% of surveyed providers intend to launch predominantly or exclusively semi-liquid ELTIFs from here. The closed-end ELTIF isn't dead, but it's no longer the default.
Where the Capital Sits
Luxembourg dominates authorisations (151 ELTIFs, €22bn) and serves as the hub for pan-European distribution. France leads on invested volume — French investors account for 41% of the total market (€14.1bn), driven substantially by ELTIFs wrapped inside unit-linked life insurance policies that carry tax advantages for retail holders. Germany has overtaken Italy to become the second-largest market at €4.4bn (13% share), with neo-brokers like Scalable Capital and Trade Republic now actively distributing ELTIFs alongside traditional bank channels.
The country-level dynamics are instructive. France and Italy, which both offer tax incentives for ELTIF investors, have raised the most capital relative to their population. Germany, which doesn't yet offer equivalent incentives, is growing fastest in absolute terms — suggesting the distribution infrastructure buildout (bank training, settlement connectivity, neo-broker integration) matters at least as much as fiscal policy.
Asset Class Breakdown
Private debt has taken the lead, accounting for 34% of total AuM (€11.4bn across 56 products), overtaking infrastructure (28%, €9.4bn) and private equity (22%, €7.6bn). This is a shift from the early years of the ELTIF market, where infrastructure — anchored by Commerz Real's klimaVest — was the dominant asset class.
The private debt surge reflects both supply and demand factors. On the supply side, the asset class is structurally suited to evergreen vehicles: loan maturities are manageable, interest payments provide recurring income, and the underlying assets are more liquid than equity positions or infrastructure projects. On the demand side, insurance wrappers in France are channelling significant capital into private debt ELTIFs — at least three products launched in 2025 qualified for unit-linked life insurance treatment.
Private equity remains the asset class retail investors are most drawn to (31% of retail-accessible ELTIF volume), but the majority of PE ELTIFs are still closed-end. Only 10 of 70 private equity products are structured as semi-liquid.
Multi-asset ELTIFs are growing fast from a low base — 29 products, €3bn — and are increasingly positioned as the entry point for less experienced investors who want private market exposure without picking a single asset class.
Costs and Fees
Average management fees across the 132 ELTIFs for which Scope has data sit at 1.80% per annum for the most expensive share class. Private equity is the priciest at 2.08%, private debt the cheapest at 1.48%. Performance fees range from 10–25% above hurdle rates of 5–8%.
The cost picture is more nuanced than the averages suggest. Institutional share classes are meaningfully cheaper (average 1.62%). Some products carry front-end loads of up to 5% for mass-affluent investors. The gap between retail and institutional pricing is a live concern — several distributors flagged fee structures as a potential drag on long-term performance and, by extension, on the product class's credibility.
Risks the Industry Is Watching
The survey data on perceived risks is revealing. The number one concern, cited by 52% of respondents, is reputational damage from inexperienced asset managers entering the market. This is a new category — it didn't feature in the 2024 or 2025 surveys. The Moonfare wind-up (August 2025) and the Greenman OPEN gating event (December 2025) clearly sharpened this concern.
The second-ranked risk — performance falling short of investor expectations (40%) — has also risen sharply. This is the tension central to the ELTIF expansion: providers are making return promises (10–15% net IRR for private equity, 6–10% for private debt) to a retail investor base that has limited experience with private markets and may not fully understand the illiquidity, the J-curve, or the role of leverage in those return profiles.
Maturity mismatch — the risk that redemption requests in a semi-liquid vehicle exceed the fund's ability to sell illiquid assets — ranked lower than in previous years (26%), suggesting the industry considers the RTS liquidity rules adequate. But the Greenman OPEN episode demonstrated that gating, while functioning as designed, generates negative press that can damage investor confidence across the sector.
Outlook to 2028
Scope forecasts market volume growing 40–50% in 2026 to around €50bn, with roughly 100 new ELTIFs expected. The medium-term consensus among surveyed providers points to €70–80bn by end-2028, contingent on products delivering returns and on supportive regulation — particularly the potential inclusion of ELTIFs in Germany's planned retirement savings account.
The consolidation thesis is also taking shape. Several market participants expect a small number of large "flagship" evergreen funds to dominate each asset class, with many smaller products failing to reach the €100–200m AuM threshold needed for economic viability. A wave of closures and mergers looks likely within two to three years.
For anyone tracking European private markets distribution infrastructure, the ELTIF data is now the clearest signal of where capital is flowing, how fast, and through which channels. The wrapper itself is becoming the market.
Sources: Scope Fund Analysis, "Mass start successful — ELTIF market overview and 2026 outlook," 16 April 2026; Alternative Credit Investor coverage, 16 April 2026.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. ELTIFs and other private market investments carry significant risks, including illiquidity, capital loss and limited redemption rights. Always consult a qualified financial adviser before making investment decisions.
Weekly newsletter
The UK alternative investment market, weekly.
New listings, FCA status changes, and market moves — every week.