Moonfare vs Titanbay
Private equity access: global fund platform vs curated UK-focused selection
Moonfare and Titanbay both solve the same problem: giving qualified individual investors access to institutional-grade private equity funds that traditionally required multi-million-pound commitments. But their approaches to fund selection, investor requirements, and platform experience differ significantly.
Moonfare is a Berlin-headquartered platform with a global footprint. It offers access to funds from marquee private equity managers — names that would typically be reserved for endowments, sovereign wealth funds, and ultra-high-net-worth families. The platform has lowered minimums to make these funds accessible to a broader (though still affluent) investor base.
Titanbay is a London-based platform focused on curating private equity co-investments and fund commitments for UK and European investors. It emphasises personalised service and tends to work with investors who have meaningful capital to deploy.
Both platforms serve sophisticated investors. The differences lie in fund access breadth, minimum thresholds, geographic focus, and the level of hands-on guidance provided.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Moonfare | Titanbay |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Investment | £25,000 | £25,000 |
| Investment Type | Equity | Equity |
| FCA Status | FCA-Regulated | FCA-Regulated |
| Secondary Market | Yes | No |
| Founded | 2016 | 2018 |
| Regulatory Category | Fund Platform | Fund Platform |
| Asset Types | Private Equity | Private Equity, Venture Capital |
| AUM / Originated | €3.3B | Undisclosed |
| Geography | Global (23 countries) | UK, Ireland, Luxembourg, Dubai |
Data sourced from platform websites and FCA register. Last updated March 2026.
Key Differences
Fund access is the primary differentiator. Moonfare offers a broader menu of funds across private equity, venture capital, real assets, and private credit — from managers like KKR, Hamilton Lane, and Carlyle. Titanbay's selection is more curated, with a focus on co-investment opportunities alongside established GPs.
Minimum investments vary. Moonfare has progressively lowered its minimums (currently from around €50,000 for some funds). Titanbay typically works with higher commitment levels, reflecting its focus on more bespoke allocations.
Geographic emphasis differs. Moonfare is genuinely global — funds span North America, Europe, and Asia. Titanbay has a stronger European and UK orientation, which may suit investors who want regional familiarity.
Both platforms charge fees on top of the underlying fund fees. Understanding the total cost stack — platform fee plus management fee plus carried interest — is essential before committing. Neither platform's fee structure is simple, and both provide detailed documentation on request.
Who Is Each Platform Best For?
Moonfare
- Investors seeking access to global marquee PE managers
- Those wanting a broader fund menu across PE, VC, and credit
- Investors comfortable with a digital-first platform experience
Titanbay
- Investors who prefer curated European-focused PE opportunities
- Those seeking co-investment access alongside established GPs
- Investors who value personalised, high-touch service
Verdict
Moonfare suits investors who want broad access to global marquee PE funds at relatively lower minimums. Titanbay suits those who prefer curated, European-focused opportunities with a more bespoke service. Both are credible gateways to institutional-quality private equity for qualified individuals.
Disclaimer: Private equity investments are illiquid, high-risk, and typically require long holding periods (7-10+ years). These platforms are for sophisticated or high-net-worth investors only. This is not investment advice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore Each Platform
Read full platform profiles with detailed breakdowns, key metrics, and editorial analysis.