CapitalRise vs CrowdProperty
Property lending: prime London specialist vs nationwide development finance
CapitalRise and CrowdProperty both offer UK investors access to property-backed lending, but they take distinctly different approaches to the market. Understanding these differences is essential before committing capital.
CapitalRise focuses exclusively on prime and super-prime London property. Its loans are typically secured against high-value residential assets in central London — the kind of property that retains value even in downturns. This geographic focus means a concentrated portfolio, but one backed by some of the UK's most resilient real estate.
CrowdProperty covers a broader geography, funding development projects across the UK. It works primarily with experienced developers on residential schemes, from conversions to ground-up builds. The wider geographic spread provides more diversification but introduces regional property market risk.
Both platforms are FCA-regulated and both have built credible track records. The choice comes down to whether you prefer geographic concentration in premium markets or broader nationwide exposure.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | CapitalRise | CrowdProperty |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Investment | £1,000 | £500 |
| Investment Type | Debt | Debt |
| FCA Status | FCA-Regulated | FCA-Regulated |
| Secondary Market | Yes | No |
| Founded | 2016 | 2014 |
| Regulatory Category | Peer-to-Peer (P2P) | Peer-to-Peer (P2P) |
| Asset Types | Real Estate | Real Estate |
| AUM / Originated | £588M | £382M |
| Geography | London & Home Counties (UK) | UK |
Data sourced from platform websites and FCA register. Last updated March 2026.
Key Differences
Geography is the defining difference. CapitalRise lends exclusively against prime London property — typically assets valued at £1 million or more. CrowdProperty funds developments across England, Scotland, and Wales, with loan sizes and property values varying widely.
Minimum investments differ: CapitalRise requires £1,000 per loan versus CrowdProperty's £500. CapitalRise also offers a secondary market for its loans, while CrowdProperty does not.
Loan-to-value (LTV) ratios tend to be more conservative at CapitalRise, reflecting the prime property focus. CrowdProperty's LTVs vary by project but are typically capped at 75% of gross development value.
Both platforms conduct manual underwriting and both hold charges over the underlying property as security. Target returns are broadly similar, though CapitalRise's prime focus may mean slightly lower headline rates in exchange for perceived lower risk.
Who Is Each Platform Best For?
CapitalRise
- Investors who want prime London property exposure
- Those who value secondary market liquidity
- Investors seeking conservative LTV ratios
CrowdProperty
- Investors wanting nationwide property diversification
- Those focused on development finance opportunities
- Investors comfortable with lower minimum (£500)
Verdict
CapitalRise suits investors who want exposure to London's premium property market with the added benefit of a secondary market. CrowdProperty is better for those seeking nationwide development finance with more granular project selection. Both are strong FCA-regulated options — the right choice depends on your geographic and risk preferences.
Disclaimer: Property-backed lending carries risk including borrower default and property value decline. P2P lending is not FSCS-protected. This is not investment advice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore Each Platform
Read full platform profiles with detailed breakdowns, key metrics, and editorial analysis.